VIZIO VF551XVT – 55″ LCD TV – widescreen – 1080p – LED Backlight technology – HDTV
- Size: 55 Inches
- Widescreen: 1080p
- Resolutions: 640×480, 800×600, 1024×768, 1920×1080
Product Description
The VF551XVT 55″ TruLED delivers the best picture quality available on an LCD HDTV. This direct type, backlit LED HDTV is comprised of 960 LEDs divided into 80 control blocks and utilities Smart Dimming to intelligently control these blocks turning them on and completely off based on the content you’re watching. This cutting edge technology stops light leakage enabling you to achieve real 2,000,000:1 contrast ratio for rich, dark scenes delivering an experience that… More >>
VIZIO VF551XVT – 55″ LCD TV – widescreen – 1080p – LED Backlight technology – HDTV
Tagged with: 1080p • Backlight • HDTV • Technology • VF551XVT • Vizio • widescreen
Filed under: 55-Inch HDTV Reviews
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
This set meets all the needs of any average american family. For those who minds run towards technical stats as if they were launching a rocket, well, they are never satisfied so this may not appeal to them, but they too would admit to features that exceed expectations and a price that does embarass big badge manufactures with 5 or more product lines. Buy it and feel the satisfaction spend the extra bucks for a otstanding sound system that Vizio sells too.
Rating: 5 / 5
I did a LOT of searching for a big screen HDTV, especially after having been literally robbed by SONY. I bought a SONY 50″ projection TV and it lasted one year before needing service. The insides of it were replaced and that lasted another year, so I started looking for another set.
When I saw the 55″ VIZIO at Walmart I couldn’t believe the picture quality, the inputs and the price. I came back home and researched VIZIO, found out they were an American company, so I went back and bought it. And I am NOT disappointed! So far, it’s been the best set I have ever had. I recommend it highly.
Rating: 5 / 5
i am a confirmed Vizio Customer. I worked my way up the the SV470XVT 120hz/1080P from Costco last Fall. and I added the optional wireless subwoofer/rear satellite speakers. Total cost under $1500! I added a Sony PS3 primarily for the outstanding BluRay dvd player and I get 1080P gaming to boot. Now I am at just under $1900 for a whitehot machine which, by the serves as my primary monitor for my MacBookPro OSX 10.5. So, lets see, oh yes, I decided I wanted the very best electrical protection for the money on AMAZON I settled on the APC5750XL “Smart-UPS” which “launders my juice to a pure sine wave feed and gives me however much back up I need. Cost last winter at Amazon, $240! so now what do I need…you got it! I need a 55 inch Vizio so bad I can taste it. Everything I now have plus 6 more inches diagonal. I find the sound output which comes on automatic at 5.1 is all most neighbors will allow me to listen to…darn it all..can’t have everything. I am now waiting for about 30 more days to see who has the best delivered pricing…COSTCO or AMAZON. I love Amazon but a few hundred means a lot to me, like another plug in back up battery for my APC750XL!
In my humble opinion, and if you are getting by on very limited income as am I…you really have no choice but VIZIO. They back their product and while the parts may come from God knows where, Vizio IS an American company! Something else to think about during these troubled times. GO VIZIO…and Amazon, make the 55″ available delivered for under $1600. I am waiting to place my Prime order!
Rating: 5 / 5
For years, I’ve made do with the same early-1990s-vintage 26-inch tube television set, waiting for the day to arrive when a big television with a great picture would turn up on the market at a decent price. When buying gadgets, it’s really easy to put off a purchase by saying, “It will be better and cost less next year.” Finally I found a screen that made me say, “It will be better and cost less next year, but only a little better and a little less.” It was time to buy.
The specifications for “high definition” top out at 1080p, unless one moves into the theatrical digital market. It looks like cable television signals, broadcast signals, movie discs, and other media all top out at or below 1080p right now, and that no higher-resolution media are planned for the near future. Thus a 1080p screen is as good as it needs to be for the near future.
Television shows are broadcast at 30 frames per second (technically, 29.97), typically interlaced at 60 fields per second. Films are 24 frames per second. For smooth results with television media, a screen needs to run at a multiple of 60 per second. For smooth results from film, a screen needs to run at a multiple of 24 per second. A screen that runs at 120 per second (120 Hz) can show television material smoothly by repeating each field twice, and can show film smoothly by repeating each frame five times. Thus a 120 Hz screen is sufficient for optimal results with media from both television and film.
As for size, bigger is better, until the screen is too large for comfortable viewing, which depends on room size and personal preference.
Another consideration is inputs. This screen has five HDMI inputs, an RGB analog computer input with analog audio, an S-video input, a DTV/TV input, two component video and audio inputs, and an audio output. One of the HDMI and one of the component inputs is on the left edge (as viewed from the front) of the screen, rather than on the back. That’s a lot of inputs; it covers just about any needs I can imagine.
This screen has numerous user-adjustable settings. In most cases, the defaults appear appropriate.
The “picture adjustment” settings include presets for various types of source material; “standard” and “movie” seem like the most useful ones to me. I adjusted the color temperature setting.
The H/V position and size settings are useful. Some television channels have a few pixel rows of jittery garbage; it’s nice to adjust the vertical position to hide them because they’re very distracting. Some channels have a few pixel columns of green on one side or the other; hiding them makes the screen look nicer.
An important adjustment feature is “viewing mode”. This screen has five settings: “normal” (4:3 pictures displayed with black bars on the sides), “wide” (4:3 pictures stretched to the full width of the screen), “zoom” (widescreen pictures scaled proportionally to the full width of the screen, even if that cuts stripes off the top or bottom), “stretch” (widescreen pictures with black bars on the sides are stretched to the full width of the screen), and “panoramic” (the edges of 4:3 images are stretched, but the center is preserved un-stretched).
Since this is my first high-definition screen (other than computer screens), I’m not an ideal judge of image quality in comparison to other sets. To my untrained eye, it looks great, and in the store it looked about as good as other sets of the same size.
The sound quality seems good for built-in speakers, but a fancy screen like this deserves a dedicated sound system.
Since this screen appears to have all the features it needs for the next few years, good quality, and a very low price, it’s a good choice — at least until something even better comes along.
Rating: 5 / 5
Background: I graduated from college in spring of 2000, and that fall, bought MY first TV: a 32″ Sharp. I thought it was great, until all the HDTV’s started coming out. My next TV was a Panasonic 51″ Rear Projection HDTV. It was great, but it really started to fade over the last year or so. Then, a capacitor exploded inside of it, so it was time for a new one.
When I was shopping for a TV, I had the following criteria:
1. 1080P. I realize that almost nothing uses this high of resolution, but I’m planning on getting more Blu-Ray discs now.
2. 120 hz refresh rate. I used to think that as long as it was a HDTV, that’s all that mattered, but if you watch sports or anything fast moving, you want this higher refresh rate.
3. At least 51″. I was looking to upgrade, not downsize.
4. Price. I wanted to spend $2000 tops.
After doing a lot of comparison shopping, I decided on this TV. It fits all of my criteria, and I’m thrilled with it.
Pros: It is a truly beautiful picture. The colors are crisp, bright, and accurate. The 120 hz refresh rate leaves no blur at all. I’ve been watching the Stanley Cup Finals (Go Wings!), and it’s truly been a treat. I can’t wait for the Superbowl. When we saw this next to all of the others, it looked as good as televisions that cost twice as much. It also has a ton of inputs. It has 5 HDMI ports, plus many others. I was finally able to get rid of my HDMI switch box. The sound seems to be pretty good, but I admit I haven’t used it much. I have my own receiver that all my sound goes through.
Cons: The cons are minor. First, I’m still a little weary on the brand. Vizio is a newer, budget brand. You’ll find lots of good reviews on Vizio online, but I’m still a little curious on how it will last. Also, I don’t like how the sound bar is integrated. The sound bar is connected to the main TV by a clear plastic section. The hookups are on the left half of the TV (as you’re facing the front), so the cables hang down and are visible through the plastic. Vizio did not create a clip or other sort of gathering area for the cables on the main trunk, to try and hide them, so they are visible. I’m going to rig something up with zip ties to try and keep them hidden.
And that is realy all the bad things I have to say. They would definitely not keep me from buying the TV again. It was a great deal at Sam’s Club ($1549), and I feel I’ve more than gotten my money’s worth.
Rating: 5 / 5